Refugee Reception and Perception in Germany and Canada
Researchers: Elke Winter1, Anke Patzelt1, Verena Schmid2, Mélanie Beauregard1, Charlotte Murret-Labarthe1, Bianca Stumpf 1, Carsten Saremba3, Georg Mildenberger2, 4, , Aïki Mekerian1, Isabelle Le Bourdais4, Friederike Alm5, Olivier Audet6, Elizabeth Marceau1, Frédéric-Guillaume Dufour6, Jessica Anne Déry1, Sanford Jones1, Benjamin Zyla1, Maya Pot1
Affiliation: University of Ottawa1, University of Heidelberg2, University of Potsdam3, and the Centre for Social Investment4
Keywords: Canada, Germany, Quebec, refugees, asylum, Syrians, media analysis, newspapers, media discourse, political discourse, representations, nationalism, national identity, integration, comparative sociology, discourse analysis
Jump to: Full Infographic, Methodology, Findings, Recommendations, Publications & Reports
Summary
Overview: This multi-year study explored media representations of refugees and refugee-related issues in Canada and Germany, from the initial influx of Syrian refugees in 2015-2016 to public claim making for/ against refugee newcomers in the following years.
Objective: to understand refugee perception in the media and public opinion and how it influences refugee integration into the national community.
Justification: Between 2015-2016, Canada resettled over 53,000 Syrian refugees and Germany accepted near 1 million refugees. While the initial reception of the Syrian refugees was overwhelmingly sympathetic, both countries faced an ongoing challenge regarding asylum decisions and refugee integration. Issues of identity and integration are heavily shaped and communicated through mainstream media.
Infographic Excerpt
Methodology
This study had three parts. The first part compared the representations of Syrian refugees in one German (Süddeutsche Zeitung) and one Canadian (The Globe and Mail) newspaper. The research team applied a critical discourse analysis to newspaper articles published between September 2015 and January 2016, the height of the Syrian refugee “crisis” to examine the relationship between national identity and migration/refuge in mainstream print media.
Part two of the study looked at public claims making for, against, and by migrant/ refugee newcomers in two different local contexts: the Rhein-Neckar Metropolitan Region in Germany, and the French and English bilingual National Capital Region in Canada. The research team sampled articles published in the Rhein-Neckar Zeitung (distributed in the German cities Heidelberg, Sinsheim, Mosbach, Buchen and their surroundings), as well as The Ottawa Citizen and Le Droit (distributed in the Canadian cities Ottawa and Gatineau and their surroundings).
The third and final part of this study re-interpreted previously collected data in new ways, using quantitative analysis and combined with empirical findings from other research projects. This part aimed to develop new theorizations of refugees’ reception and perception in Canada (Ottawa, Ontario and Montreal, Quebec) and Germany (the Rhein Neckar region around Heidelberg).
Findings
The study found that representations of Syrian refugees in these newspapers (Süddeutsche Zeitung and The Globe and Mail) generally reflect the national traditions of both countries (i.e. Germany as an ethnic nation and Canada as a settler society). However, they also highlight some peculiarities and contradictions. The articles in the Süddeutsche Zeitung reveal stark divisions within German society regarding “the refugee question” (supporters versus opponents), as a result of which the German national solidarity seems to be compromised in favour of an alliance between Germans supporting refugees (the majority) and the refugees. The articles analysed in The Globe and Mail demonstrate that the media coverage of Syrian refugees in Canada is less negative in comparison to that of other refugee groups. However, this positive representation is mainly used to highlight the “true” character of the Canadian nation, i.e. its generosity and benevolence toward minority groups.
In both Canadian and German contexts, politicians and members of civil society organizations are most successful in making their voice heard, while migrants/refugees are seldom allowed to speak for themselves. The research reveals tensions between claims made at a national/federal level on the one hand and actions at a local level, mostly by members of civil society, on the other. The latter practise citizenship through pragmatic actions; by providing assistance, they facilitate refugees’ membership in the local community.
The study concludes that there is no longer one public space as it pertains to the representation of refugee arrival and settlement (if there ever was). Representations vary not only between one news outlet to the other, but also whether the adopted perspective (within the same newspaper) is that of the national or local level, i.e. whether issues of admission, national security, target numbers are discussed, or whether the main issues are housing, schooling, language acquisition, employment etc. Concerns at the national level often dominate media representations on refugees and reflect negatively upon refugee reception. Representations of refugee settlement and claims-making at the local level tend to be more positive and underline shared humanity and shared citizenship (in more than the legal sense) that unites receiving communities and newcomer populations.
Recommendations
Winter, E., A. Patzelt & V. Schmid. 2020. “Mapping Public Responses to the ‘Refugee Crisis’: Who claims what in Heidelberg and Ottawa/Gatineau”, A. Korntheuer, P. Pritchard, D.B. Maehler & L. Wilkinson (eds.) Refugees in Canada and Germany: From research to policies and practice (GESIS-Schriftenreihe, 25), Köln: GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, 99-119, https://doi.org/10.21241/
ssoar.66728.
Click to read >
Explore more projects